Do you use the best static site tech stack?
Last updated by Tiago AraΓΊjo [SSW] 4 months ago.See historyPure HTML pages are the fastest website around. However, server-side scripting languages enable richer functionality. Static sites solve this problem by providing the best of both worlds. Static sites are:
- Cheap
- Easy to use
- Fast
On the other hand, complex functionality can be a bit more limited and time consuming to implement.
Here are some popular static site generators:
Features
Name | NextJS (Recommended) | Gatsby πͺ¦ | Astro | Hugo | Builder.io |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Language | React | React | Most major JS frameworks via islands | Go | Customizable |
Data Handling | Fully customisable | GraphQL | Fully customisable | Customizable | Fully customisable |
Data Sources | Fully customisable | Filesystems, CMS, APIs, Databases, Local files | Fully customisable | Filesystem | CMS, APIs, Customizable |
GitHub Pages Integration | Requires setup | Seamless deployment via config files | Deployment via GitHub Actions | Deployment with GitHub Actions | Customizable |
TinaCMS integration | β | β | β | β | β |
Note: πͺ¦ Gatsby is no longer being actively developed.
Market Share
(Data captured in late 2024)
Name | Next.js (Recommended) | Gatsby | Hugo | Astro | Builder.io |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GitHub Stars | 127,000 π | 55,000 | 75,000 | 47,000 | 8,000 |
NPM Downloads (Weekly) | 6,000,000 π | 260,000 | N/A | 247,000 | N/A |
Stack Overflow Questions | 92,000 π | 15,000 | 6,000 | 2,000 | 100 |
BuiltWith Sites | 1,400,000 π | 126,000 | 167,000 | 483,000 | N/A |
State of JS (2023) | 57% used it π | 17% used it | N/A | 17% used it | N/A |
Google Trends Rank | 1st π | 4th | 3rd | 2nd | 5th (almost 0 data) |
Two examples of static sites in action are SSW People and SSW Rules.
There are a few hosting options to choose from including:
Name | Description | Pros | Cons |
---|---|---|---|
Vercel | A fast, developer-friendly platform optimized for frontend frameworks like Next.js, with built-in CI/CD and global edge deployment. Vercel is recommended for applications built using Next.js. | π Automatic deployments, fast CDN, Next.js support, serverless functions. | β Limited free tier, can be costly for high traffic. |
Azure static web apps | Microsoft's solution for deploying static sites with integrated APIs, authentication, and automatic GitHub/Azure DevOps deployments. | π Integrated with Azure Functions, authentication, GitHub Actions, free tier available. | β More complex setup. |
Azure static storage | A simple, cost-effective way to serve static files from Azure Blob Storage with CDN and custom domain support. | π° Cheap storage costs, integrates with Azure CDN, scalable. | β No built-in CI/CD, manual setup needed. |
Cloudflare | A high-performance static site host leveraging Cloudflareβs global CDN, DDoS protection, and edge computing capabilities. | π Free global CDN, DDoS protection, edge functions, fast builds. | β Limited build minutes on free tier, less backend flexibility. |
GitHub Pages | A free, GitHub-integrated static site hosting service, best suited for personal projects, documentation, and Jekyll-based blogs. | π Free for public repos, easy integration with GitHub, supports Jekyll. | β Limited to static sites, no server-side processing, slower updates. |
Surge.sh | A lightweight, CLI-based static hosting service thatβs quick to deploy and great for simple, no-frills web apps. | β‘ Super simple CLI deployment, free tier available, custom domains supported. | β Fewer features, no built-in CI/CD, not ideal for large-scale projects. |